Editorials

A neighborly conversation:

Aaron Timlin on the left and Brandon Walley on the right

Aaron Timlin on the left and Brandon Walley on the right

A neighborly conversation:
Today’s topic, a Robocop statue in Detroit w/ Aaron Timlin and Brandon Walley

We here at thedetroiter.com would like to create a new segment that promotes discussion about great debates that come up in the art scene here in Detroit. We want to bring about dialogue in a less noisy, realistic and , most importantly, local way. Sometimes fiery debates dominate the discourse creating divisions, tangents, hyperbole, or even become the cover story of an out of town newspaper. Using the wonder of Google docs and presenting it for the first time ever in a blog format that connects to a large participatory audience, we present to you a collaborative interview format, where we can get what we want to say out, beat the news cycle out of a soundbite, and remind everyone that in this tiny city, we’re all just having a neighborly conversation.

This first question is for Brandon Walley who is the Director of Development of the Imagination Station and works with John Leonard (local artist, graphic design) and Jerry Paffendorf (LOVELAND, Imagination Station) and Mary Lorene Carter (LOVELAND, Imagination Station).

thedetroiter.com: What is it that you do and how big is this project compared to everything else that the Imagination Station does?

Brandon: I started working with I.S. last fall as a volunteer and helped with funding. Over the winter I’ve become more invested in the team’s mission to create a creative campus out of two abandoned/blighted homes, off of Roosevelt Park in Corktown and have taken on the role of Development Director.

We recently submitted a proposal and are being seriously considered for a grant from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation for a major community engagement initiative we are launching this year called Living In the Map: Corkstarter. I could go at length about the proposal, but at it’s heart, Corkstarter is a combination of online mapping, social networking and crowdfunding, coupled with on the ground community engagement meant to better the quality of life for every demographic that lives in Corktown. It is an adaptable model that can be successfully integrated into other neighborhoods in the city. The full proposal can be read here: Living In the Map: Corkstarter

We are also creating a digital lab for the community to help bridge the digital divide. The campus will also have a tech residency program where developers will work on programing that falls in-line with our community engagement mission.

So by representing Imagination Station in the process of building RoboCop in Detroit, I feel that a project like this has merit and can be a catalyst for generating interest in the work we are doing at I.S. as well as bring attention and support to other important community projects and organizations in Detroit. It may seem unfortunate that a sexy project like RoboCop is gaining such attention when Detroit needs so much, but it can be turned around to help with more important issues, and that is what Imagination Station will help facilitate.

thedetroiter.com: Aaron, both you and Brandon work out of Whitdel Arts and happened to run into each other to initially have this conversation. What would you say is the reason you got interested in this conversation? Is it worth having?

Aaron: It is important to maintain a healthy dynamic by having the difficult conversations, if for no other reason then to gain an appreciation and understanding for where the other side is coming from. In this particular case, there is a disagreement to place a statue, conceived and financed privately, in a public park, our commons. We seem to have this tendency to come to a place and feel it needs to be changed. It would be refreshing if people, when they come to this city, could live here for awhile without changing it. Explore it first. Meet the people that share the commons, that have a history, a home or memory of one, that know the paths most and least travelled on.

We face an ever increasing threat of privatization with Bing’s right sizing and Bobb’s school industrializing. While large corporations occupy space in Downtown without paying a cent in taxes, every year hundreds of poor families in the neighborhoods lose their homes to tax foreclosure. That is injustice. We should be furious about this and stand up against it. Well, now I am getting into the argument and not addressing the question at hand. Yes, it is worth having this conversation.

thedetroiter.com: This question can be answered by either of you, how strange is it that the conversation ‘blew up’ on facebook?

Aaron: Not strange at all. It is partly the way revolutions have been won, as evidenced in Egypt. Not sure I would call it a conversation, though. Some heated choppy fragments of a debate, accusations and name calling. What I find interesting is the residual discussion of us vs them. Us being Detroiters and them being non Detroiters or “transplants” as I have seen referenced.

Brandon: No, digital technology is continually a dominant medium for communication. It has it’s pros and cons. It’s great to get ideas out… promotion, education and whatnot, but social media often fails with the nuance of understanding. Facial expression, tone of voice, things like that are needed. OMG doesn’t cut it for real dialogue most of the time. Of coarse this is illustrated completely by this RoboDebate. I’ve spent A LOT of time over the past two weeks emailing exchanges with upset Detroiters about RoboCop. In some cases we have been able to meet in person, sit down over coffee and look at each other. A few of these times I walked in thinking it may be very confrontational, but every time at the end, we’ve come away with a clearer understanding of each other and a stronger community bond. This isn’t to say we may come to a complete agreement, but we do find the value of each others point of view.

thedetroiter.com: Aaron at some point you compared the anti-robocop statue group to the Egyptians successfully taking out Mubarak, how do you account for some of your ridiculous comparisons?

Aaron: Our revolution is against foreign corporate interests and their desire to impose their agenda on us. Robocop is such a case. There are hundreds of unheard voices in this discussion about a Robocop statue planned for the historic and public Roosevelt Park. My friend and fellow compatriot Jean Wilson put it well in a letter to the Imagination Station, “Think of the residents of Southwest and west Detroit just trying to go about their business who are people of color and therefore do not get a warm fuzzy feeling when they see the police.” She went on to write, “Why hurt anyone at all when it is completely unnecessary? And why bulldoze ahead with a plan that is oppressive to most and culturally ignorant at the least?” I feel the Robocop issue is bigger then an ugly statue installed against our will in a public park. It is indicative of the ugly and socially destructive process of gentrification and corporate influence in that process. This is another case of artists whoring themselves out for corporate interests/money. Word is that this began with a challenge by the person or corporation that owns the copyright to Robocop. If Imagination Station were to raise the first $25K, the copyright holder would match it. That is what happened. A great investment strategy for the copyright holder who will reap all the financial rewards as a result of this. Who is really winning in this situation? Not the people of Detroit. And not the artists who are essentially selling out. Additionally, the individuals behind the Imagination Station are coming from a place of privilege. They are dictating (dictator) what will be placed in historic public spaces used mostly by those of less privilege and with less of a voice. In this sense there is an abuse of privilege. When we use our privilege to do good for ourselves be it to promote our public image or organization, or even a cause, we fail our society, our humanity. That is if we are working towards a better society. In the work for a greater Detroit, we must do everything possible to use our privilege to advance those individuals who have less and who deserve more. We do the opposite when attempting to impose our “great” ideas on others without including them in the conception stages. Especially when it comes to the issue of protecting our commons.

Brandon: See now the major flaw in what you’re saying is that it doesn’t pertain to this project. There was never the intention to put RoboCop in a public park. Imagination Station is next to the park, it is privately owned and is the default location. But it is not our top choice. We are talking to city officials and private institutions about other locations which would make more sense in our urban landscape.
As far as unheard voices, we have been doing everything possible to be involved in a healthy conversation. I think this is one of the most important aspects to this project and necessary for Detroit to move ahead in a positive direction.

thedetroiter.com: Brandon, at any point were you worried about buzz or mainstream media molding the conversation?

Brandon: Any press is good press right? I’m being facetious, but there’s some truth to it. Detroit needs a lot, but it is also an amazing dynamic place. I love living, working and playing here and I want people to know it. In a BBC interview the host joked that “why RoboCop when Detroit is such a dump.” He was being sarcastic, but I called him on it and by the end of the interview he conceded that his views are based on media perception and if my passion for Detroit is genuine (which it is and I’m far from alone) then he needs to investigate and reassess his thinking. As long as those of us involved are being transparent and true to our mission the media coverage should, and has for the most part, reflect that. In this case, I need the media to get the message out and help to do positive things in Detroit.

Aaron: Detroit does not need a lot of press. I just want to respond to Brandon’s statement above. What do we really get out of it? So far the press is not well representative of Detroit and the people here. I’ve not seen anything that has benefited from the press about Detroit. Maybe an individuals reputation. Corporate interests benefit by slanting the stories one way to attract a certain demographic to the city that will accelerate the gentrification process. Press? We don’t need it. We will continue to do what we do. Living, working and playing here is for us to do regardless if someone wants to write about it and share that with the world. If the purpose the statue serves is to gain attention for Detroit from the outside, well, first it is a gimmick and second, when the hell did we need attention from the outside. Perhaps outsiders feel a need to have that attention, because they are not truly living here. Back to my point about living in Detroit without changing it. I wish people would try that first.

thedetroiter.com: Aaron you talked a little bit about how you know first hand what it’s like to not be able to talk about something that’s blowing up in the media, like the raid on the CAID, what has your experience been?

Aaron Timlin: Well, sometimes we choose not to talk because it would do more harm than good and sometimes we are ordered not to talk. I don’t believe I was ever ordered not to discuss the raid. I did talk to the press initially. However, we wanted to have an agreement put in place that would prevent the police from violating our rights and raiding our nonprofit again. We spent two years negotiating such an agreement and I am happy to say we got what we wanted. If I had have continued to speak to the press, it would have agitated the matter and made the negotiations more difficult.

thedetroiter.com: Brandon, there has been metaphors drawn between the project of Robocop and it symbolizing people coming together for a greater cause, and there are people that criticize it and say that it’s quite a grand comparison about what the statue of Robocop will do for the city, how do you respond to that? And what do you hope Robocop will be a catalyst for?

Brandon: I don’t have notions that a RoboCop statue will save the city or be some monumental positive message. But it is a positive catalyst and that was always my hope. Spin-off fundraising is going on and we are working to come up with some cool funding that will help kids in DPS that relates to our interest in digital arts and also ties in well with RoboCop. Public events like a double feature of Robo 1 and 2 are being planned for Burton Theatre and proceeds will go to the community. So, what I really dig is that this conversation has provoked people to support organizations that are doing really amazing work in our city. This is funding that would not have existed before.

thedetroiter.com: Aaron, many people say that if they wanted to do their own project, they should raise the funds themselves and do it, do you share that sentiment? Lastly, do you have anything to say to a structure of how your criticisms and the imagination station’s aims could be combined? For example, it was suggested that perhaps we should attempt to convince the people who were involved in creating Robocop to donate something and attach themselves to a local cause that they fundraise for.

Aaron: Sure. Why not? However, the funds for this project we are discussing were not raised by individuals alone. I don’t believe the project could even happen without one major donors investment (I dare not call it a donation) and approval since they own the copyright. Bowing to foreign corporate interests is something I will fight against, not align myself with. I really don’t believe this is the aim of the Imagination Station. Maybe the publicity is.

thedetroiter.com: And from this point, we’d like to open up the discussion to whoever would like to chime in! Which still includes Aaron and Brandon if you would like to field them questions. Do you think there is a compromise somewhere between integration (as opposed to gentrification) and bringing in the spectacle that is Robocop or something similar?

Discussion

20 comments for “A neighborly conversation:”

  1. Well I have called on this issue personally to my friends of the Imagination Station. I have had very strong resolve about raising the identity of the city and initially all I could feel from this was a negative connotation. However, I will say this has given cause to a many of people to rise out of their seats and be accountable for what they want to happen in their own city. SPERAMUS MELIORA!!! Let’s make things happen!

    Posted by Marianne Audrey Burrows | February 22, 2011, 10:41 pm
  2. Sure, racial profiling had been a problem in the past. But might this be a seriously flawed argument regarding that point?(btw I love Jean) Initially I thought RoboCop was another playfully childish idea. But since everyone has been unable to move on, I once again begin to see this argument as the typical Detroit bitterness of self entitlement(and perhaps a bit of jealousy in denial?). Despite it’s aesthetic “foundation” or lack of, I am FAR more curious as to why I have not seen any blog posts about the 50 tons of metallic bullshit sculpture at Heart Plaza and campus martius that I find far more offensive in it’s breeding of dulled down Detroit culture.

    Posted by Gregory Peckory | February 23, 2011, 12:00 am
    • Why not take a vote on the stupid statue? And which “bullshit” hunk of art are you talking about? There are several in that area. The or are you referring to Joe Louis only? Course not, that would be “racial profiling” wouldn’t it? Only those who have never been profiled think it’s non-issue.
      I don’t care where you go, or what your intent is, if you’re a newcomer and you start changing things and doing new things without consulting the people already there, you’re intentions can be the best; you will incur resentment, hostility, resistance from those you have been considerate enough to ask if they feel the same as you.
      It’s human nature.
      You wanna be part of the community or dominate it? You have to act like a neighbor to be treated as a neighbor.
      Are you afraid to talk to your neighbors? Do you care what they think or feel? Or are you just running on arrogance, assuming that whatever is good for you is good for everyone?
      Personally, the thought of looking at Robocop turns my stomach. Of all the superheros, this is the only one YOU THINK IS APPROPRIATE?
      How do you feel about a group of us natives getting together and erecting a statue of Coleman Young in the park near you, as a tourist attraction? Or Malcom X in the yard next to yours?
      You need to wear our shoes for a day!
      I got some suggestions for you.
      Why not Dave Bing? Sonny Elliott, Rosa Parks, Isaiah Thomas? Bill Laimbeer, Denzel Washington, or Clint Eastwood would have been a great choices to me! I could have respected that movie hero in a heartbeat!
      Hell if you just gotta have a robot, then why not some of the Transformers?

      Posted by Cherise116 | February 23, 2011, 10:43 am
    • Gregory, do you mean that racial profiling is over? Would you be willing to announce this “fact” to the community of blacks, Arabics and Latinos? They will be so relieved!

      Posted by Jean Wilson | February 24, 2011, 8:42 am
  3. A few clarifications and thoughts:
    * The matching funds did not come from a corporation that owns any sort of RoboCop Copyright. Pete Hottelet, who matched the funds is a business owner that is tied to the movie because of his personal love of the movie and a cleaver knack to create real-life products from popular movies. Personally I don’t see anything wrong with that. And working with him on the project, has proved to be smart and very conscious of Detroiters perspective. Sorry, there’s no Big Brother thing happening here.
    * Maybe just a difference of opinion, but I think press is very necessary. The revolution must be televised. Other organizations have raised thousands of dollars as a result. How can you deny?
    * One more time with feeling! We have never had the intent for the awesome, inspiring RoboCop to be put in a park or on private land.

    There was something else… Well, I’ll wait.

    Posted by Brandon | February 23, 2011, 12:06 am
  4. er, i meant PUBLIC land.

    Posted by Brandon | February 23, 2011, 12:29 am
    • Location, Location, Location! – Robocop and his duty to his community

      For the record, I do not mind a Robocop statue. What I do mind is the fact that it might be placed on the periphery of Roosevelt Park in a highly public setting.

      While listening to the Craig Fahle coverage of the RC statue debate a bit back, I was at least somewhat heartened to hear John Leonard express an understanding that the location of the RC statue will determine its meaning.

      Basic public art theory 101: the statue’s eventual environment will also determine whether the RC statue is a public or private work and what the creators might owe to their community.

      Regardless if it is on private property, if the RC statue is placed on the periphery of Roosevelt Park (a public park) next to Michigan Central Station (one of the city’s most photographed buildings) directly off of Michigan Avenue (one of the major arteries in Detroit) and across from Slows BBQ (a frequented restaurant), the piece will be public.

      If it is to stand there, the RC statue would reside too close to a highly public sphere to legitimately claim it is a privately owned work. Regardless of who funds it, it would still be piece that the public is subjected to on a repeated and regular basis.

      Many people claim that they cannot possibly have a problem with the statue because it will be placed on private property and funded with private funds. However, using the common adage of freedom and private property to justify the aesthetics of (or on) a property comes dangerously close to aligning with the arguments that many speculators use to skirt the responsibility of renovating or destroying their blighted buildings.

      Subjecting the public to your aesthetic, without determining who the public is and what the public actually wants to look at, suggests that the creators are comfortable forcing the public to go along with their vision of the city, similar to a Mr. Moroun or a Mr. Kelly. At least in respect to morals, the more controversial a structure on your property is the more responsibility you have as an owner to heed to the needs of your community.

      In addition, 25,000 dollars worth –roughly half of the funding –came from one man who owns an energy drink company in California. This could be argued to be just one more example of rich guys who don’t reside in Detroit taking advantage of its cheap property.

      Perhaps a comparison to speculators is extreme. But if the creators really believe in the erection of the RC statue, they need to reach deeper to justify their reasons for following through with this. Their simplistic “well… why not?” attitude is disrespectful and irresponsible. It is an important time for Detroit and it is important that we all look inward to determine our specific roles in improving the city as a whole.

      Posted by KH | February 27, 2011, 2:39 pm
  5. I believe that the social media catalyst that spurred the RoboCop statue is healthy and should not be discarded because the statue may be “cheesy” or lack sufficient substantive meaning for “true artists” (note, though, RoboCop did stand for serving the public trust and upholding the law, and the movie itself was a commentary against undue corporate influence, so some of the objections appear to mischaracterize its underlying purpose). Rather than analyzing the statue and impetus through a filter that some foreign force is placing a random statue in my neighborhood, we should analyze it through the filter that something is getting done through collaboration in a short period of time (rather than new stories of great landscape changing ideas for Detroit that never materialize, yet pop up as headlines about once a year).
    I will judge the statue’s aesthetic relevance when it is actually completed. Until than, I want to focus on this idea that an idea sparked a dialogue, sparked crowd-funding, and sparked a contribution to Detroit, and I want to focus on how I/we can use the framework for this idea to spark projects that I/we attribute value.

    Posted by Colin | February 23, 2011, 8:07 am
    • So this is the best you can do? Talk about the artistic value of the statue? You think that this is dialog? It’s not, these are just comments without real substance, at least not for us. The issue isn’t about the art itself, it’s the meaning behind the statue. I don’t give a rat’s ass that it’s about the corruption that Robocop had to clean up, that in and of itself leaves a bad taste, especially after Kwami.
      And his crime fighting? we all know who the criminal were before he got around to icing the corporate bad guys. The city was so bad a guy had to be half cyborg to tame it. Go ahead pat yourself on the back. and don’t think it slipped by us that his name was FRANK MURPHY. THE GOOD OLD FRANK MURPHY HALL OF JUSTICE WHERE ANYTHING BUT JUSTICE IS DISHED OUT DAILY! Yes, that cloaked insult, the cheap slap in the movie.
      Don’t piss on me and tell me it’s raining, and then get mad at me because I’m suing your ass for doing it. Frank Murphy, bringer of justice.

      Go ahead and try to get all intellectual about at, the facts still remain, it’s an insult and an offense to the city. Same reason the Muslims protested the Danish cartoonist for his “art”.
      People know when they are being insulted and put down, no matter how nicely your dress it up and try to convince them it’s not an insult.
      You should’ve picked Clint Eastwood and “Grand Torino” as your heroes, that would have been classy, not trashy.
      I’m an artist too, imagine what I could do with my pottery, very lifelike renderings of my favorite heroes, gifted to someplace near you.

      Posted by Cherise116 | February 23, 2011, 11:02 am
      • An angry rant is substantive dialogue. Frank Murphy (for whom the court house is named) was a legal scholar who fought for equal rights for all before it was fashionable (Mayor of Detroit and then Justice of the Supreme Court), so, again, not something to view as disparaging. And, from my experience, the Judges at Frank Murphy work tirelessly in the face of extreme emotionally-draining cases to dispense justice. It is fair that a statue that symbolizes a movie that glorifies violence and an ugly version of Detroit crime would anger you. But why would you make it more than it could possibly be – a deep, painful insult to the city? It’s people having fun with an imaginary character. I would save your anger for people that actually, purposefully hurt other people.

        Posted by Colin | February 23, 2011, 11:32 am
  6. I meant to pose that as a question: an angry rant is substantive dialogue? Which, of course, it is not.

    Posted by Colin | February 23, 2011, 12:46 pm
  7. Frank Murphy was all that but the symbol today is nowhere near that rosy. His memory is tarnished.
    Robocop, It’s the insult that won’t go away. Hated the movie, worse than imagining Teenaged Mutant Ninja Turtles as representing Birmingham.
    Once it was made clear we didn’t approve, that should have been the end of it. Now it’s become a cause with a bank account. It’s not a fountain, not a flower bed, not a true symbol of this city and certainly not a “tourist attraction”. Most of the other statues and memorials around town were in place decades before we were born, not much choice in them, besides they were former mayors and such who were victims of their own self delusions of grandeur, paid for by them for them. Had nothing to do with the community they were cheating and stealing from at all.
    How Detroit is viewed by the outside world is extremely important, more than most people realize. When you are casually speaking with a group of Californians and you say “I’m from Detroit” and everybody in the circle takes a step back, looks terrified and half start making excuses to leave, and the other half want to know how YOU managed to survive those mean, evil streets long enough to get OUT? And from that point on all the neighbors are scared of you and your kids, who tell the rest of the neighbors to “Be careful, they’re from DETROIT! Don’t mess with them! You might get shot” (It was galling because at the time LA was inventor and king of the drive-bys.)
    And this happened everywhere from South Central LA to Victorville to San Jose, it was very disturbing.
    Outsiders see us as all violent criminals, dangerous and volatile, gun carrying, drug dealing killers. It got so bad my kids stopped telling people where they were from at all.
    What a difference 18 yrs made, between the first time I lived in California to the last time. From being from the city that made the cars to outlaw from the murder capitol.
    And we are still living that title down. Detroit was the code word for crime, it was in all the TV shows, movies, songs.
    Like the Tee shirt that said
    “I’m so bad I vacation in Detroit”
    I’ve seen the city at it’s best and worst.
    We are never going to pull back up to our old glory unless all the dumping, the insults, backbiting, the hostility and the partitioning of the city stops.
    You can’t create an oasis here and there and let the rest of the city go to hell. And you can’t do by cramming everybody into a few areas and let the rest go to hell.
    A city divided against itself can’t prosper. We have to have more than just dialog, we have to become unified and in agreement, to respect all our neighbors and neighborhoods equally.
    There have been no less than 2 complete generations that never saw the city the way it was before the riots, never experienced the city whole, intact and not littered with burned out corner stores and abandoned houses waiting to be burn or be torn down. Never lived a day without somebody on some TV show talking about how BAD Detroit is or how dangerous.
    One last thing, the money being gathered for this Robocop could have, so far, bought at least 8 vacant homes in that area, 8 families would be housed and off the streets. Home bought and paid off completely with only taxes to pay yearly.
    8 families or 1 statue of a movie hero, think about that, ask around. That is our current and increasing crisis, a tsunami of foreclosures that has to be stopped and homes reoccupied. Detroit survived the scandal HUD vacancies of the 70’s. Don’t think it will survive this foreclosure wave, and there can’t be any recovery without fixing this first.

    Posted by Cherise116 | February 23, 2011, 1:36 pm
    • Regarding your point about the past perception of Detroit versus the current perception, I think we should use the innovative aspects of the RoboCop stir for what the community may feel has value. Like you said, the funds generated could have been used to house people on the street. But appealing to the broad public’s sense of right likely would not generate the buzz the gimmicky RoboCop statue generated.

      One idea that could promote Detroit and foster a vision of the City that is universally respected is to expand the Motown-theme. We should ask ourselves if there is a way to harness this crowd-funding phenomenon with the end-goal as putting Detroit back into the Motown package. For example, Florida has http://www.cityplace.com/, which is a destination of shopping and entertainment carved out of the city – you park and walk around in a discrete, destination specific environment. Could we generate funding on a larger scale to carve-out an entertainment area that is all things Motown (our Disneyland – maybe have the Motown Museum in the center)? Just an initial thought.

      I would love to see a large sculpture that pays tribute to that reputation.

      Posted by Colin | February 23, 2011, 2:23 pm
      • We had that, it worked for many years, despite some heavy efforts to strangle the city.
        It was called the Ethnic Festivals, every weekend in the summer thru to fall. Didn’t matter which group was the focus for that weekend, there was always a crowd, it was peaceful, uplifting, the place to be was the waterfront, the entertainment was first class and the food was divine. the vendors were happy, the people were happy, it was unique, it was better than the fireworks and it was every weekend!
        And then there was the Grand Prix!
        Imagine looking out your office window and watching the cars streak around the track right below you! I used to watch from the City-County building, it was hard to focus on working!
        We had people from all over the world coming in and staying for weeks during the summer. If you worked the behind the scenes of the Grand Prix you got free tickets to the main races. and both those activities made the city money in all kinds of positive ways.
        So I ask, what happened? I’m not even sure we still have the boat races anymore…Yes, apparently we still do.

        Are we repeating Detroit’s history?
        Way back in 1914 somebody had an idea that caught on and raised incredible amounts of money since it’s inception and still raises money today.
        This is one of the reasons Detroit is called the Renaissance City, the city that rebuilds itself.
        2wt5
        “DETROIT GOLD CUP SPEED BOAT RACE”
        “During the winter of 1914-15 Chris Smith went to New York to see Blackton in a final effort to sell him a boat. After four or five days there things looked pretty bad for Smith. One night a poker game had stripped him down to his last seven cents. He received a telegram from Detroit. He tipped the messenger boy the seven cents and went to bed.

        That night he had a dream. He saw a beautiful speedboat being displayed on Cadillac Square, Detroit, beside the Pontchartrain Hotel and hundreds of beautiful flower girls were throwing basketsful of dollar bills into the boat. The money had been given by the people of Detroit. In his dream Smith even began to lay out plans for the boat.”

        “That’s the idea,” Smith told himself the next morning. “Build a speedboat for Detroit and raise the money by popular subscription.”

        “He borrowed one hundred dollars from friends in New York and rushed back to Detroit. At the Pontchartrain Hotel he met Sherman Wooley and William J. Chittenden. He told them of his dream.”

        The men were interested. “That dream can be carried out, Chris,” Wooley said. “It’s the easiest thing in the world.”

        “They called a meeting of civic leaders for March 30, 1915. Among those present were Hugh Chalmers, head of the Chalmers Motor Company; William E. Metzger, one of the original organizers of the E. M. F. Automobile Corporation; William E. Scripps, publisher; Horace E. Dodge, Sr., head of Dodge Brothers; Otto Barthel, Detroit attorney; Paul H. Deming, Dr. Crevier, C. Harold Wills, of the Wills St. Clair Company; Frank Boydell, John J. Barium, Arthur Waterfall, Chas. T. Bush, Havelock Northmore, Dr. James W. Inches. These men organized the Miss Detroit Powerboat Association. Later the author [J. Lee Barrett] was appointed secretary.”

        “We talked about speedboats and racing that day, about rules and qualifications, about displacement and restrictions. No one in Detroit knew much about these things. Detroit had never seen a speedboat race of any importance. All the races for the Gold Cup Trophy had been held in the East-on the St. Lawrence river, Lake George, the Hudson river, Chippewa Bay. But never, never in the Middle West.

        And the Harmsworth? The Harmsworth race had never been held west of Long Island. The idea of shipping English boats to the interior of the American continent was unthinkable in 1915. Even as late as 1930 Sir Henry Segrave didn’t want to ship his Miss England II to Detroit. He said it was too far inland. He wanted the Harmsworth race held at Miami, Florida.”

        “That’s why some of us thought that Smith’s dream sounded like the dream of a very young, imaginative boy. Detroit did not know speedboats. How could we raise enough money to build a speedboat in this town?”

        “Well-we didn’t. Chris Smith built the boat but we couldn’t raise enough money in Detroit to pay him for it. And yet, that little meeting in the Pontchartrain Hotel in 1915 set the stage for the highest drama in Harmsworth history. It poured 600,000 race-crazy spectators to the banks of the Detroit River in 1931. It also set the stage for the Gold Cup races for many years.”

        “It is true that Chris Smith didn’t have the scientific equipment for building speedboats that other builders had. There was a great deal of technical work going on at the time among boat builders that was completely foreign to him. When he went to the National Motorboat Show in New York in 1914 the experts started to discuss friction, wetted surfaces, air resistance and model testing in the government tank at Washington.

        Smith admitted openly that he knew nothing of these things; that he was just an ordinary speedboat builder who got his ideas for speed under actual tests out on the St. Clair River.

        “Well, what about displacement. How do you figure displacement?” they asked him.

        “Displacement?” he said, surprised. “I don’t care about displacement. All I need is enough water to cool the engines, that’s all.”

        “And yet the boats he had built for Blackton won every important trophy in America in 1912, except the Gold Cup. His Baby Speed Demon II, built in 1914, was the first boat in America to travel over fifty miles an hour, officially.”

        “Now, Chris Smith went to work building the dream boat, Miss Detroit I. It was a single-step hydroplane powered with a new Sterling engine of 250 horsepower which Charles Criqui had developed at Buffalo, N. Y. William E. Metzger took it out on the St. Clair River for a trial run. Before he stepped into the boat Chris Smith said to him, “Be careful, Billy. This is the fastest boat I’ve ever built.”

        And Smith was right. When Metzger came back to the boatwell after the run he said, “For the first time, Chris, the West will win the Gold Cup.”

        They shipped the boat to Port Washington, Manhasset Bay. The first heat for the famous Gold Cup Trophy in 1915 was run on Saturday, August 14. The Miss Detroit I and the Detroit crowd received scant attention at New York. For days before the race the sportsmen and the newspapers were talking chiefly of Blackton’s Baby Speed Demon II and Baby Reliance V; Charles F. Chesebrough’s Tiddledey Wink which was reputed to have traveled at 82.5 miles an hour over the government course at Glen Cove on July 23; Count Mankowski’s Ankle Deep Too; Tech, Jr., owned by T. Coleman du Pont; and the P. D. Q. VI, owned by A. Graham Miles and Mrs. Henry Devereaux Whiton, Hewletts, L. I.; and Carl Fisher’s Presto. The Miss Detroit I and her owners were barely mentioned in the advance reports.”

        Posted by Cherise116 | February 24, 2011, 7:33 pm
    • Cheridse you have sooo many great points. They just don’t know and they use their ignorance. How could anyone that feels what we have been telling them still go forward with this? Who cares about our problems here in the city? I am personally faced with a 4,500 tax bill due or a family of hard working legal immigrants will loose his house this March, in just a few weeks. The guy who donated it and left the state also lied to us that he paid the tax of 2008 and we believed him. Since I am in the middle by facilitating the transaction I can not walk away. There is an element of racism in every step of this story and the result is that now I am stuck with the bill as the only way to prevent innocent people from getting hurt.

      Posted by Jean Wilson | February 24, 2011, 9:03 am
      • Thanks for the support. I see what you do as very worthy and positive too, helping families with their struggles in housing, something down to earth and rebuilding the city’s neighborhoods, action not wild talk and fantasies. We need more things that actually do something for people besides entertaining their fantasies!

        Posted by Cherise116 | February 24, 2011, 7:04 pm
  8. I see this as an inspiring example of how to make something happen. The end result might not be something everyone can agree is even a worthy idea, it seems more based on whimsy. Like the first thing that popped into someone’s head. But to me even that seems incredible. If you can imagine it, you can build it. This opens so many doors, I would love to see everyone oppose to this, or inspired by it, start up a fund drive and get something financed. The journey from seed to finished piece seems the most fascinating part of this ride.

    Why isn’t there a statue of Rosa Parks or Malcolm X Or Coleman Young? These were all mentioned in the above comments. There should be, those people aren’t necessarily my passion, so I’m not your man but maybe this paves the way for individuals to start trying to take this on. Just like Robocop it wouldn’t need city approval, just build one and stick it in your front yard.

    Colin there was talk about ten years ago about a new Motown museum in the Woodward building before it was torn down. Funding ran dry. But I always thought an interactive place like the Hendrix museum in Seattle, would be sweet. You could have people go through the “finishing school” to try and learn the dance moves, there just seems like there could be a lot of possibilities with that or have a Michigan music place and include with Motown, the MC5 and Stooges, Have an interactive “garage” or basement and get a crummy band together with other museum patrons.

    Posted by Andy Krieger | February 24, 2011, 7:24 am
    • A new Motown Museum! Now that’s an idea I can support wholeheartedly! It’s a multifaceted project that can easily include interactive components for the people to play with, like the Children’s Science museum in Toronto.
      Motown itself was the kind of thing everybody could get with, it touched the world, it was a driving force that still reverbs today.
      You could do so much more with that and it’s so much more positive, just like the first time around.
      Good call!

      Posted by Cherise116 | February 24, 2011, 6:58 pm
  9. This is great: http://www.detnews.com/article/20110224/METRO01/102240403/1409/Ticked-off-artist-does-battle-with-RoboCop

    Marianne Burrows is trying to raise money for an art park, something she sees as positive in contrast to the RoboCop statue. Great job Marianne!

    Posted by Colin | February 24, 2011, 9:46 am
  10. Right on Marianne! This is exactly my point. If you are dissatisfied with this idea. Which yes, leaves a lot to be desired. Do something about it. Do what you think is the right way. Quit all this crying and teeth gnashing, this idea appealed to the public to give up their funds, other worthier causes might not. There is nothing to be done but try.

    Posted by Andy Krieger | February 24, 2011, 10:16 am

Post a comment

*